Assessing Washington's policy towards Ukraine for The Atlantic, Senior Fellow Max Abrahms examines findings from international relations scholarship, suggesting that "the most relevant ones urge greater caution in America’s approach to countering Russia."
Research Fellow Christopher Mott authored a contribution for Responsible Statecraft examining how maximalists look at WWII and think the Ukraine war can take a similar path, but he suggests that that is
For New Voice of Ukraine, Senior Fellow Andrew Latham explains how Beijing has pursued a hedging strategy vis-à-vis Ukraine and Russia while at the same time it has endeavored to avoid being
It does not look like Kazakhstan is abandoning its commitment to a multi-vector foreign policy, defined by balancing diplomatic relations with Russia, China, and the West. Increasingly finding itself in the middle
One year after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, there remains no end to the war in sight. For ISPI, Zachary Paikin underlines the need for a "negotiated settlement," an option that could avert a
For UnHerd, IPD Research Director Arta Moeni explores the possible outcomes of the war in Ukraine. One year on with no endgame in sight, he argues that "the likely outcome of this
Pour La Presse, Jocelyn Coulon s'interroge sur la possibilité d'ouvrir le dialogue avec le Kremlin afin de mettre fin à la guerre en Ukraine. Il évoque le durcissement de l'opinion publique et
Dans un article pour Le Devoir, Jocelyn Coulon s'interroge sur l'évolution de l'ordre international, évoquant l'érosion de certaines règles et normes internationales ainsi que l'émergence de nouveaux acteurs remettant en cause la
European foreign policy in the Indo-Pacific could "nurture" the Union's strategic autonomy by establishing a "delineated hard security role in the South China Sea while maintaining a degree of distance from the
The Institute for Peace and Diplomacy hosted a panel on 'One Year After Russia’s Aggression: What Future for NATO?' on February 13, 2023.